Cost of Living in Marshfield, MA has an overall index of 172, 72% above the U.S. baseline of 100. The typical home value is $804,818 (Zillow ZHVI, Aug 2026); typical monthly rent is $2,669 (Zillow ZORI, Aug 2026); and median household income is $97,105 (Census ACS 2024).
Cost index: committed city housing/rent inputs and BEA 2024 regional price parities. Home value: Zillow ZHVI market signal as of 2026-08. Rent: Zillow ZORI market signal as of 2026-08. A place-level signal, not a personal affordability decision or financial recommendation.
Home prices are the main source of pressure. This describes the local market, not your household.
Four questions readers ask most, answered from the committed sources below. Every figure keeps its source, vintage, and limitation; none of it is personal financial advice.
Committed BEA price-parity components are missing for this place, so its non-housing costs are not compared with the nation.
The comparison needs all three category parities (goods, services, utilities) from BEA 2024 regional price parities. At least one is absent for Marshfield, and this page does not substitute the overall cost index for them.
The typical home value is $804,818 (Zillow ZHVI, Aug 2026). It is 28% above the $628,338 median across Massachusetts cities in this dataset, and 165% above the committed $303,400 U.S. baseline used site-wide (Census ACS 2019–2023).
The typical monthly rent is $2,669 (Zillow ZORI, Aug 2026). It is 2% above the $2,620 median across Massachusetts cities in this dataset, and 98% above the committed $1,348 U.S. baseline used site-wide (Census ACS 2019–2023).
The Massachusetts median is a cross-city statistic over the 123 committed city home values and 123 committed city rents (Zillow Aug 2026, HUD FMR, or Census ACS 2024 as matched per place). It is not a statewide household median and it is not appraised market data. U.S. baselines are Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians used across this site ($303,400 home value; $1,348 monthly gross rent), and have not been refreshed to the ACS 2024 city vintage or the Zillow Aug 2026 vintage. Any city-to-national gap therefore mixes vintages.
The committed figures line up: rent-to-income ratio and price-to-income ratio point the same way relative to their baselines (higher ratios and lower vacancy count as one direction, and their opposites as the other), and no compared figure points the other way. That is a description of this one snapshot, not a forecast.
33% · Typical rent equals about 33% of local median household income (Zillow ZORI Aug 2026 rent × 12 ÷ Census ACS 2024 median household income). These are two place-level aggregates, not a measured household or renter burden. The Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians imply 21%.
Baseline: 21% implied by Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians8.3x · The typical home value is 8.3 times local median household income (Zillow ZHVI Aug 2026 home value ÷ Census ACS 2024 median household income). This is a place-level ratio, not an individual affordability test. The Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians imply 3.9x.
Baseline: 3.9x implied by Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians9.3% · 9.3% of all housing units here are reported vacant in Census ACS 2024. That counts every vacant unit, including seasonal, occasional-use, and other vacant homes, and it is not current for-sale or for-rent inventory. The population-weighted mean across the committed city dataset is about 8%.
Baseline: about 8% committed city-sample mean70.2% · 70.2% of occupied units are owner-occupied in Census ACS 2024, against a committed national owner-occupied share of 64.6% (Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians). This describes tenure mix — more owners usually means a smaller rental stock, not by itself higher or lower pressure.
Baseline: 64.6% committed national owner-occupied shareThese are associations inside one committed snapshot, not causal evidence. The dataset has no current listings, pending sales, sale timelines, or construction, migration, income-growth, and unit-mix fields, so nothing here proves or disproves a housing shortage: a low vacancy rate or a high rent-to-income ratio can have several explanations. Treat the figures as context for your own search, not as a cause.
A monthly budget is not estimated because this place has no committed BEA non-housing parity to scale everyday costs.
The five-person estimate needs the BEA non-housing parity, and this place does not have one in this snapshot.
Housing and rent: Zillow ZHVI Aug 2026 home value; Zillow ZORI Aug 2026 rent. Top-coded ACS values stay thresholds, never exact medians. Non-housing: BEA 2024 goods, services, and utilities price parities (regional). Why: rent Zillow ZORI Aug 2026, home value Zillow ZHVI Aug 2026, plus Census ACS 2024 income, vacancy, and owner-occupancy fields. National baselines: Census ACS 2019–2023 5-Year national medians (not refreshed to ACS 2024 or Zillow Aug 2026), so city-to-national gaps mix vintages. Budget: modeled from the committed national median household income and this city's exact rent and BEA non-housing index; assumptions and exclusions are listed with the table. Budget is not produced when rent is top-coded.
Start with four decisions. Open advanced assumptions only when you need to replace the local defaults.
Enter your income and housing plan to see a household-specific estimate.
Search one destination and see which housing and local-cost categories change most.
Recommendations require usable housing and income data and exclude very small places for a city of this scale.
Yes — Marshfield is about 72% more expensive than the national average, with an overall Cost Index of 172. Housing is the biggest factor: the typical home here is valued around $804,818, and monthly rents average roughly $2,669. Day-to-day costs like groceries and utilities tend to run closer to the national norm.
Start with housing. Typical monthly rent is $2,669, while local median household income is $97,105. That implies a rent-burden proxy of about 33% before utilities and other costs. Use that as a planning signal for whether the place looks manageable under your own household assumptions.
Massachusetts uses a progressive model; 9% is top marginal-rate context. Applying the 1% state-level effective owner-occupied proxy to a home worth $804,818 gives a planning estimate near $8,048 per year; it is not a city, county, parcel, or individual tax bill. State plus average local sales-tax context is around 6.25%.
The typical monthly rent in Marshfield is around $2,669. That's about 98% higher than the $1,348 national median. For comparison, the median home value here is $804,818, so buyers should also factor in mortgage payments, property taxes, and insurance.
The typical home value in Marshfield is $804,818. With 20% down and the committed 7.03% national 30-year fixed benchmark as of 2026-09-24, principal and interest are roughly $4,297/month before property tax and insurance. This is a planning estimate, not a local lender quote. Baseline is past its weekly update cadence; a newer official vintage exists but is not reflected. About 70% of residents here own their homes.
Grocery prices in Marshfield are about average compared to the rest of the US (index: 100, where 100 is the national average). Utility bills (electricity, gas, water) are about typical (index: 100). Overall, these everyday costs shouldn't cause major surprises if you're moving from another similarly-sized US city.
Marshfield is a small town with a population of about 5,161. The median age of residents is 46.1, skewing somewhat older — common in established suburban communities. The local poverty rate is 17.4%, above the national average of 12.4%.
